"The Continuing Fragmentation of Language" is about the interpreting and abstracting of graffiti by removing the importance of its physical location and literal meaning in favor of leaving hints that it once was bound to a surface but is now an artistic composition. By using a short depth of field I have been able to illuminate letters, create depth where none existed, emphasize texture and take the written word one step closer to abstraction. How does context and scale either define or make this relationship more ambiguous? This series of new work emphasizes the depth of texture and richness of color found while exploring these macro landscapes.